<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Explonential.dot.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.explonential.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.explonential.com</link>
	<description>Blogging today about tomorrow.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 09:35:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drugs are good for you! by Girish</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/drugs-are-good-for-you/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Girish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 09:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=415#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>Yes, Absolutely!! This is my whole point and none of my friends believe me...
But I dont give a damn!! coz I know drugs are here for a solid good reason.... and ill use it for meditation purpose, to understand my inner feelings, to understand the world better..... 

About chemical drugs, Everything is chemical....so any recreational drugs is good for health, Just like the H20...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Absolutely!! This is my whole point and none of my friends believe me&#8230;<br />
But I dont give a damn!! coz I know drugs are here for a solid good reason&#8230;. and ill use it for meditation purpose, to understand my inner feelings, to understand the world better&#8230;.. </p>
<p>About chemical drugs, Everything is chemical&#8230;.so any recreational drugs is good for health, Just like the H20&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atheism vs Ismael: The debate heats up by Caney O</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/atheism-vs-ismael-the-debate-heats-up/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Caney O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=294#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>I can see how being an atheist improves our lives. We can sit around and condemn people because we have no moral standard to adhere to. Believing in nothing means we can spit on whomever we want. Its so fun being an atheist. I think the word asshole evolved from atheist. I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how being an atheist improves our lives. We can sit around and condemn people because we have no moral standard to adhere to. Believing in nothing means we can spit on whomever we want. Its so fun being an atheist. I think the word asshole evolved from atheist. I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atheism vs Ismael: The debate heats up by Fred Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/atheism-vs-ismael-the-debate-heats-up/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=294#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>Yah, we came from monkeys and swung in the trees. Ha ha, you are an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, we came from monkeys and swung in the trees. Ha ha, you are an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Emotional Beliefs by Malcolm Sinclair</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/emotional-beliefs/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Sinclair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=151#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Hey there, I see you would be interested in video marketing. I&#039;m using this software that generates traffic. Thanks to that I&#039;m able to make 5$ for 1 video I upload. You should check it out at http://tiny.cc/yttraffic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, I see you would be interested in video marketing. I&#8217;m using this software that generates traffic. Thanks to that I&#8217;m able to make 5$ for 1 video I upload. You should check it out at <a href="http://tiny.cc/yttraffic" rel="nofollow">http://tiny.cc/yttraffic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Western media are lying Osama Bin Laden&#8217;s burial by Vel</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/western-media-are-lying-osama-bin-ladens-burial/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Vel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=445#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>Thing is, why should we even care if Bin Laden was buried properly? This is the guy responsible for for turning people into ash at the WTC, and denying the victims&#039; families a proper burial. He was responsible for not just 9/11 but terrorist attacks around the world. More liberal Muslims claim he wasn&#039;t even a true practicer of Islam (although that falls under the No True Scotsman fallacy for me).

The media was wrong to lie about burial at sea being okay (although I saw at least one Islamist say it was okay if there was no way to quickly bury the body in the soil) but all the other rites were performed, and even that I think was more than he deserved. Besides, at least this way no one can find the body and dig it up or create a shrine to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is, why should we even care if Bin Laden was buried properly? This is the guy responsible for for turning people into ash at the WTC, and denying the victims&#8217; families a proper burial. He was responsible for not just 9/11 but terrorist attacks around the world. More liberal Muslims claim he wasn&#8217;t even a true practicer of Islam (although that falls under the No True Scotsman fallacy for me).</p>
<p>The media was wrong to lie about burial at sea being okay (although I saw at least one Islamist say it was okay if there was no way to quickly bury the body in the soil) but all the other rites were performed, and even that I think was more than he deserved. Besides, at least this way no one can find the body and dig it up or create a shrine to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jesus was an atheist that knew how to swim by Vel</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/jesus-was-an-atheist-that-knew-how-to-swim/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Vel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=330#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can spot cultures that know how to swim, because their religion usually paints the sea god as a fickle god, a taker of life, like Posiedon. &quot;

I think you mean *don&#039;t know* how to swim? 

Other than that interesting post. I&#039;ve never gotten into the whole historical Jesus vs made-up Jesus. I think if there was a real preacher named Jesus, stuff attributed to him got out of hand, much like how St Nicholas theses days is fat, has flying reindeer, wears a red suit, and lives at the North Pole instead of in Turkey. Jesus, if he was an actual person, might have been honest or he might have been good at sleight of hand, like a magician. OTHO I see the incredibly close similarities to Mithra, so I wonder if the whole Jesus idea wasn&#039;t just co-opted from pagans to begin with. So I&#039;m pretty open to both options atm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can spot cultures that know how to swim, because their religion usually paints the sea god as a fickle god, a taker of life, like Posiedon. &#8221;</p>
<p>I think you mean *don&#8217;t know* how to swim? </p>
<p>Other than that interesting post. I&#8217;ve never gotten into the whole historical Jesus vs made-up Jesus. I think if there was a real preacher named Jesus, stuff attributed to him got out of hand, much like how St Nicholas theses days is fat, has flying reindeer, wears a red suit, and lives at the North Pole instead of in Turkey. Jesus, if he was an actual person, might have been honest or he might have been good at sleight of hand, like a magician. OTHO I see the incredibly close similarities to Mithra, so I wonder if the whole Jesus idea wasn&#8217;t just co-opted from pagans to begin with. So I&#8217;m pretty open to both options atm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to convert people to atheism using NLP by Andy B</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/how-to-convert-people-to-atheism-using-nlp/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=354#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>BTW1, that photo of the bus - the poster has a classic error in it - a failure to understand how the intended audience are likely to respond to certain words.

In this case the instruction to &quot;stop worrying&quot; is likely to have created more resistence than it avoided, because (in my fairly long experience) one of the things many people hate to think they are doing - about anything - is &quot;worrying&quot;.

BTW2, did you hear about Dawkins&#039; next great idea?  Another poster, this time showing two smiling children with the slogan: &quot;Please don&#039;t label me.  Let me grow up and choose for myself.&quot;

Problem:  The two children photographed for the poster came from a family of devout Christians.  Still, as their father said, it was nice to know that the atheists who selected that photo thought that his children looked the epitome of genuine happiness and intellectual freedom.

BTW3, if Dawkins et al want children to be left free to think whichever way they choose until they are old enough to make genuinely independent decisions about what they will believe, why are they trying to promote summer camps where the children (presumably the offspring of atheists?) will be further inculcated with atheistic notions?
Looks like incredibly confused thinking, especially coming from someone who so modestly labels himself and his fellow thinkers &quot;brights&quot;.
(ROTFLMBSO)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW1, that photo of the bus &#8211; the poster has a classic error in it &#8211; a failure to understand how the intended audience are likely to respond to certain words.</p>
<p>In this case the instruction to &#8220;stop worrying&#8221; is likely to have created more resistence than it avoided, because (in my fairly long experience) one of the things many people hate to think they are doing &#8211; about anything &#8211; is &#8220;worrying&#8221;.</p>
<p>BTW2, did you hear about Dawkins&#8217; next great idea?  Another poster, this time showing two smiling children with the slogan: &#8220;Please don&#8217;t label me.  Let me grow up and choose for myself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Problem:  The two children photographed for the poster came from a family of devout Christians.  Still, as their father said, it was nice to know that the atheists who selected that photo thought that his children looked the epitome of genuine happiness and intellectual freedom.</p>
<p>BTW3, if Dawkins et al want children to be left free to think whichever way they choose until they are old enough to make genuinely independent decisions about what they will believe, why are they trying to promote summer camps where the children (presumably the offspring of atheists?) will be further inculcated with atheistic notions?<br />
Looks like incredibly confused thinking, especially coming from someone who so modestly labels himself and his fellow thinkers &#8220;brights&#8221;.<br />
(ROTFLMBSO)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to convert people to atheism using NLP by Andy B</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/how-to-convert-people-to-atheism-using-nlp/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=354#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>Admin asked:

&quot;I am curious Andy, [1] how do you define yourself religiously, and [2] separate from the existence of god, do you think that churches are a force for good in the world?&quot;

1. I am a Christian, though not a particularly good example.

2. Churches are like any other organization - any given church is as &quot;good&quot;, or not, as the people leading it and the people who attend it.  A good church is - in my opinion - one where the congregation get the kind of education in their religion that would enable them to knock behaviour like that you advocate on it&#039;s backside without stopping to draw breath.

For example, near the start of this blog you say:

&quot;Anyway, forget the moral dilemma, this blog isn’t about why, it’s about how.&quot;

To which the very obvious answer is simply:  &quot;Only a person with no moral standards would claim they could divorce their behaviour from the moral standards on which it is based.&quot;

End of story.

By the way, since you imply that your standard of intellect is higher than people with conventional religious beliefs, I invite you to read one of John Lennox&#039;s recent books which purports to rebut the various arguments put forward by Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchins, etc., just as he has nailed Dawkins, Hitchens and others in public debates in various countries.

Of course the arguments are presented openly to encourage thought, rather than covertly or in a way that would circumvent thoughtful consideration.  But I bet you can get used to that if you try ;-)

It&#039;s called: &quot;Gunning for God: Why the New Atheists are Missing the Target&quot;, published by Lion.

Come to think of it, if you really want people to think things out for themselves, why do you rely so heavily on covert manipulation?
Seems kinda self-defeating/rather revealing, if you know what I mean.  Nudge, nudge, wink, wink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin asked:</p>
<p>&#8220;I am curious Andy, [1] how do you define yourself religiously, and [2] separate from the existence of god, do you think that churches are a force for good in the world?&#8221;</p>
<p>1. I am a Christian, though not a particularly good example.</p>
<p>2. Churches are like any other organization &#8211; any given church is as &#8220;good&#8221;, or not, as the people leading it and the people who attend it.  A good church is &#8211; in my opinion &#8211; one where the congregation get the kind of education in their religion that would enable them to knock behaviour like that you advocate on it&#8217;s backside without stopping to draw breath.</p>
<p>For example, near the start of this blog you say:</p>
<p>&#8220;Anyway, forget the moral dilemma, this blog isn’t about why, it’s about how.&#8221;</p>
<p>To which the very obvious answer is simply:  &#8220;Only a person with no moral standards would claim they could divorce their behaviour from the moral standards on which it is based.&#8221;</p>
<p>End of story.</p>
<p>By the way, since you imply that your standard of intellect is higher than people with conventional religious beliefs, I invite you to read one of John Lennox&#8217;s recent books which purports to rebut the various arguments put forward by Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchins, etc., just as he has nailed Dawkins, Hitchens and others in public debates in various countries.</p>
<p>Of course the arguments are presented openly to encourage thought, rather than covertly or in a way that would circumvent thoughtful consideration.  But I bet you can get used to that if you try <img src='http://www.explonential.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s called: &#8220;Gunning for God: Why the New Atheists are Missing the Target&#8221;, published by Lion.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, if you really want people to think things out for themselves, why do you rely so heavily on covert manipulation?<br />
Seems kinda self-defeating/rather revealing, if you know what I mean.  Nudge, nudge, wink, wink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to convert people to atheism using NLP by Gifty</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/how-to-convert-people-to-atheism-using-nlp/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Gifty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=354#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>This person who wrote this is trying to persuade other people to change into what they beleive. Oh my god! when I see them  knocking at my doors with a smile and bag full of leaflets I tell them &#039;look I respect your beleif but I have my right to my own belief&#039;. So now out of desperation they are using NLP skills which is unethical!! 
Thank God I have not come from a family who beleive in those &#039;convertor beleif religions&#039;. Thank God for my Ancient Hinduism it accept any one and any beleif so you have no such urge to go around to convert every one to beleive what you beleive!!

Please do not use NLP for wrong purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This person who wrote this is trying to persuade other people to change into what they beleive. Oh my god! when I see them  knocking at my doors with a smile and bag full of leaflets I tell them &#8216;look I respect your beleif but I have my right to my own belief&#8217;. So now out of desperation they are using NLP skills which is unethical!!<br />
Thank God I have not come from a family who beleive in those &#8216;convertor beleif religions&#8217;. Thank God for my Ancient Hinduism it accept any one and any beleif so you have no such urge to go around to convert every one to beleive what you beleive!!</p>
<p>Please do not use NLP for wrong purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arming Libyan rebels, are you mad? by Dominic Caraccilo</title>
		<link>http://www.explonential.com/arming-libyan-rebels-are-you-mad/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Caraccilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explonential.com/?p=438#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>The quality of life and security for the citizens has been largely restored and we are a large part of why that has happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of life and security for the citizens has been largely restored and we are a large part of why that has happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

